Food Crisis and
the Coming Anti-Joseph
“The seven years of
abundance in Egypt
came to an end, and the seven years of famine began, just as Joseph had said.
There was famine in all the other lands, but in the whole land of Egypt
there was food. When all Egypt began to
feel the famine, the people cried to Pharaoh for food. Then Pharaoh told all the
Egyptians, `Go to Joseph and do what he tells you.’”
(Genesis 41: 53-55)
heart-rending to learn what people will sometimes do in order to quell the pangs
of hunger. In a desperate response
to food shortages, they may riot and steal as is being witnessed in various
countries around the world in recent times.
In the story of Joseph, we see that people were prepared to do everything
that he said in order to avoid starvation.
Put in such a situation, acts of desperation to avoid immediate tragedy
was the case in Egypt almost 4,000 years ago when
Joseph reigned as vice-regent. He
had been put in charge of the entire kingdom of the Pharaoh and was commissioned
to prepare the nation for a coming seven-year famine.
He ended up being an economic potentate.
The entire commercial structure of the known world at that time, as well
as almost all the land in Egypt came under
the control of this one man.
Thankfully, Joseph was a godly person and his actions led to the saved lives of
perhaps millions of people. Yet,
the Bible remains silent on its judgment of his techniques.
However, it is evident to any reader that the consequences of his actions
were not entirely ideal. The entire
ownership structure of the land of Egypt was changed virtually overnight
from private ownership to vassalage.
Also, as a result of Joseph’s policies, a system of onerous taxation
resulted that is “still in force to
today.” (Genesis 47:26)
imagine what would happen if this type of power were given to a diabolical
A Sometime Misinterpreted
Bible story of Joseph, one of the 12 sons of Jacob, is a popular favorite.
Not only does it celebrate the ultimate blessings that accrued to a
righteous man, the story also shows how God can miraculously enter into the
seemingly unfortunate occurrences of our lives and ultimately work them out for
good. (Romans 8:28) Yet, it may
also be true that some aspects of Joseph’s life have been sometimes
misinterpreted. For one, more than
a few twist this Biblical account as a proof reference for the existence of
modern day Josephs.
example, an organization called the Joseph Company exists today whose mission
involves people who they claim have the “anointing
of Joseph. People who have been prepared by God to be to our generation as
Joseph was to his, with focus on preservation of life and the awareness of
God-ordained transfers of wealth and power.”
The Bible does not say that Joseph was anointed nor that there is any
such special anointing today. There surely are people who are “double-gifted” in
business just as there are talented violinists.
the story of Joseph is often used by those who wish to legitimize their quest
for riches or claim a basis for a Spirit-led ability to profitably forecast
financial markets and economic trends.
If anything, the story of Joseph counsels the exact opposite as we will
see. What also may not be
immediately obvious is that there are many levels of prophetic foreshadowing to
be found in this account, not to mention endtime warnings for Christians living
today. We will only scratch the
surface of these possible meanings here.
There is little harm in availing ourselves of the interpretive modes of
both “remez” (prophetic hints) and “midrash” (parallels and
allegories), so long as we do not obviate or revise any literal plain
meanings of the entirety of Scripture.
fact, doing so, we see that the account
of Joseph found in the first book of the Bible actually foreshadows the great
dangers of an economic enslavement of the world in the last days — what is today
the growing result of globalization.
(What is globalization?
It is the present-day process bringing about a world-controlling, materialistic
structure under the common incentives of prosperity and gain.) It makes for
a very interesting and surprising perspective.
Joseph: The Picture of an
see Joseph as an Old Testament picture of Christ.
He suffered so that he might be able to save his family in
Egypt; to go ahead and prepare a place for
them. Much is also made of the fact
that Joseph is the only character in the entire Bible besides Christ of which no
character flaw or sin is explicitly mentioned.
While this is true, Joseph was a sinner like every other human being.
The only difference is that his sins and misdeeds are a little more
hidden. In fact, through his
errors, this great man of God like all the others from Abraham to King David can
be seen to have bequeathed lessons to mankind that are very relevant for our
closer examination of his life reveals that the results of his actions were not
entirely virtuous. While it is true that
he served to save many lives, his mission was not performed entirely in the
spirit of a merciful rescue operation.
In the end, he instituted an oppressive system of control over the people
Egyptians had to virtually sell their souls and freedoms to gain access
to food. With the exception of a
few — mainly Egyptian priests, the immediate family of Joseph and probably other
high-ranking elites — the entire land of Egypt came under the direct ownership
instructive to review how this all happened.
When the famine first spread over the whole country,
“Joseph opened the storehouses and sold
grain to the Egyptians.” (Genesis 41: 56)
Notice that he did not donate the grain to needy people, but instead
required payment. Think of it.
People were starving and he asked for money.
Few Christian aid organizations today would think that they are
fulfilling Christ’s command to “feed the
if they were profiting from their ministries.
Another aspect to notice is that
“… all the countries came to
to buy grain from Joseph, because the famine was severe in all the world.”
(verse-57) Here in the first book
of the Bible we find the very roots of modern-day “globalization.”
The whole world converged together for reasons of “bread.”
Egypt had become
the world commercial center and its grain became the common currency.
Pharaoh came to this position of controlling the entire world by
dispensing the means of economic sustenance.
Here we see that the incentive of gaining “bread” had been harnessed by
one centralized system … even one man.
This same process is sweeping the entire world today under the guise of
“globalization” — the promise of bread for the entire world.”
time, because the famine was so severe, Scripture tells us that Joseph collected
all the money that was found in Egypt
No doubt, he deposited the funds in Pharaoh’s coffers.
He took every last penny in return for grain so that people might eat and
be saved from the famine. What was
the result? Now, the entire monetary system of that time was under his control.
all the monetary savings of the people had been used up, they then faced a
cash-crunch. The famine continued
yet they had no grain and no money.
What to do next? They begged Joseph
to give them food. What did Joseph
do in response? He next took
control of the nation’s industry.
He demanded their livestock. “So
they brought their livestock to Joseph,
and he gave them food in exchange for their horses, their sheep and goats, their
cattle and donkeys. And he brought them through that year with food in exchange
for all their livestock.”
Joseph was in control of a large part of the capital stock of Egypt.
For Pharaoh he now had secured the ownership of the land-based
transportation system (donkeys and
horses) and the productive capacity of factories … in other words,
livestock. After all, in an
agrarian society as existed during that time, livestock represented assets that
generated food and a large part of household income.
Now that Joseph had control of the key “factories” he could also now sell
the outputs of milk and meat, as well as transportation services.
However, the takeover by the state didn’t stop there.
The famine continued. People
needed more grain and they became desperate. “Buy
us and our land in exchange for food, and we with our land will be in bondage to
Pharaoh,” they now said. (verse
19) So Joseph did exactly that.
He completely reduced the people to servitude and all the land — from one
end of Egypt to the other — became the
property of the state and under the control of one man.
Joseph saved many lives by storing up grain during the seven good years.
That was good. But were his
specific techniques ordered by God?
He may have even gathered all the excess grain in the land by decree.
No mention is made of him buying the surplus grain, though it
specifically states that he later sold it.
Scripture simply says that he gathered it.
In fact, the text strongly suggests that he did not buy the grain,
stating that the stockpiles eventually became so large that he was no longer
able to keep an account of their size. (Genesis 41:49)
Had he purchased the grain with money
from the Pharaoh’s treasury, this problem would likely not have occurred. We can
be reasonably sure that the Pharaoh would have required an accounting of how his
money was being spent.
Whatever the case, whether or not policies of confiscation were pursued, in the
end all the people of the land ended up in complete servitude.
It doesn’t appear so much a work of mercy when it becomes clear that the
whole saga turned out to be a giant opportunity for the secular Pharaoh to gain
power and wealth at the expense of those in need.
An Endtime Trap Foreshadowed
long did it take for the entire known world to come under economic bondage to
the Pharaoh? Scripture suggests
possibly three and one half years.
Three one year periods appear to be indicated, two of them mentioned
specifically. Livestock was used in
payment for one year of grain supply. (Genesis 47:17)
Another year was survived by giving up ownership of land. (verse 18)
Before these two years, Joseph had already taken all the money in the
land. (verses 13-15) For several
reasons we could conclude that this period could not have taken any longer than
one year. As most wealth was
represented by livestock and land in that day, physical money did not play as
significant a role in the livelihoods of people.
If only one year’s grain was purchased with livestock, then their money
would certainly not have lasted any longer than a one period either.
And, as already suggested, Joseph may not have bought the grain in the
first place. Therefore, the seven
years of plenty would not have produced a big cash horde in people’s pockets.
logic, we so far count no more than three years.
One additional half year is accounted for by the fact that it would have
required at least one crop cycle for people to run out of food.
As the Nile
basin at times could support two grain harvests each year, it would be logical
to assume that people would only have had laid aside provisions for one
half-year, long enough to last until the next harvest.
In any case, Joseph’s massive gathering
program of excess grain would have ensured that not much more would have been
laid aside by private farmers. That
suggests that six-months of drought would have first taken place before food
postulations here are correct, we can conclude that it required a three and
one-half year period to bring the entire world under the control of one system
that was under the authority of one man.
From that time on they were in bondage, required to pay a 20% tax on the
output of their labours.
first three and one-half year period of the seven-year famine
(“the beginning of birth pains”- Mathew
24:8) can be seen to foreshadow the first half of the 7-year Tribulation.
It is during this period that a great world ruler gains increasing power,
the Antichrist. He first brings the
world under his control in the name of peace and prosperity.
Then, once he has much of the world in his grip, he tightens the noose
and brings doom to the earth. Later
yet, starts the Great Tribulation, the second three and one-half years
(also known as Jacob’s trouble – Jeremiah
alignment between Joseph and the Antichrist a coincidence … perhaps even a
sacrilege of the beautiful story of Joseph?
Not any more than is the recognition that this diabolical last-day ruler
is specifically also conjured up to be a false christ, the Antichrist.
If you agree Joseph was a type of Christ, then wouldn’t it only follow
that the Antichrist would also be an Anti-joseph?
Whereas Joseph had a benevolent calling ordered by God to save physical
lives, the Antichrist is a demonically-inspired person that seeks to physically
entrap mankind for the purpose of destruction and his worship.
Jesus Christ came to offer spiritual life for an eternity.
The Antichrist comes to do the opposite.
the three and one-half year period required by Joseph to enslave all of
is an inappropriate parallel to the timeline of the first half of the
Tribulation, the process of the enslavement of the people is highly significant.
For the sake of bread, the people first gave up their money, then their
livelihoods and professions, then their land and bodies and souls.
Points to Ponder
many people are looking for a modern-day Joseph — an economic savior.
They want to find solace in a comfortable life, low mortgage payments, a
secure job, growing financial wealth, expanding export markets and an unfettered
playing field for the globe’s burgeoning multinational corporations.
Globalization is the sure route to that outcome say many leaders and
politicians. It is the sure route
to a “World free of poverty” (the slogan of World Bank).
However, we must freely participate with our hearts, land and factories
to serve this global system so that we might take part in the fruits of a
world-wide economic order. So it
may be. However, humanity risks
falling captive to an Anti-joseph.
world looks to this system for sustenance, they become enslaved to its rulers
and potentates. Eventually one man
— the Antichrist — will arrive at its pinnacle of power to take control.
And, most likely, he at first will appear as an Anti-joseph.
After all, today, people are more interested in an economic savior than a
spiritual one. Much of the world
certainly the societies in the Western World —
have already forfeited their
spiritual futures in their primary pursuit of earthly prosperity and happiness.
Anyone who offers workable solutions to that end will be gladly
the people angry with Joseph when he enslaved them?
Not at all.
"`You have saved our lives,’ they said.
`May we find favor in the eyes of our lord; we will be in bondage to Pharaoh.’"
(Genesis 47:25) Here we see that
they willing gave themselves up for bondage to the Pharaoh so that they might
entire world will do so again the Bible indicates.
Only this time it will be in response to Anti-joseph.
They will willingly allow themselves to become economically and
financially enslaved to a diabolically-inspired person.
Why? So that they might eat … that they may have economic security and
hopes of a material quality of life.
process is already long underway on a broader scale in the form of a world
“globalization,” accelerating in leaps and bounds these past few decades.
This phenomenon itself has virtually become a god of prosperity and is
already advanced to the point where Anti-joseph could arise at any time.
That day could be very near.
Only the Lord tarries, the Church and the Paraclete first to be removed.
SUBSCRIBE TO WILFRED’S FREE NEWSLETTER
For resources on “endtime
economics” and to subscribe to the free newsletter, Eternal Value Review,
visit Wilfred’s website www.
eternalvalue.com or contact him at
About the Author:
Wilfred J. Hahn
is a global economist/strategist.
Formerly a top-ranked global analyst and chairman of the country’s largest
global investment operation his writings focus on the endtime roles of money,
economics and globalization. He has
been quoted around the world and his writings reproduced in numerous other
publications and languages. His
most recent book is The Endtime Money Snare: How to live free.
If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat; if he is thirsty, give
him water to drink.
Proverbs 25:21. Also see